First, the real poor do not drive German luxury cars. They ride public transit. Second, if the reason that people are using fake tags is because they can't afford real tags, that is an income problem that I would be happy to address. Waive fees for low income car owners by increasing them for high income car owners? I mean these costs are trivial compared to car insurance, and are on the order of a tank of gas. There will be somebody who is immiserated by these costs but they are in deep trouble already as soon as they need a car repair ($72!!!). In Virginia it is $30 and literally the cost of a tank of gas.
Comments, observations and thoughts from two bloggers on applied statistics, higher education and epidemiology. Joseph is an associate professor. Mark is a professional statistician and former math teacher.
Friday, March 3, 2023
Law and order
First, the real poor do not drive German luxury cars. They ride public transit. Second, if the reason that people are using fake tags is because they can't afford real tags, that is an income problem that I would be happy to address. Waive fees for low income car owners by increasing them for high income car owners? I mean these costs are trivial compared to car insurance, and are on the order of a tank of gas. There will be somebody who is immiserated by these costs but they are in deep trouble already as soon as they need a car repair ($72!!!). In Virginia it is $30 and literally the cost of a tank of gas.
Thursday, March 2, 2023
Thursday Tweets -- You can take the boy out of South Africa...
Sometimes in life, you just have to take a stand on the things you really believe in. Like racial segregation. https://t.co/Zr6yRYmfK6
— Ron Filipkowski πΊπ¦ (@RonFilipkowski) February 26, 2023
Scott Adams goes on blatantly racist rants for three days, including a video where to tells white people to stay away from black people, his comic strip gets canceled by multiple publications so …
— Ron Filipkowski πΊπ¦ (@RonFilipkowski) February 25, 2023
… perfect time for Elon to engage to give him a boost. pic.twitter.com/FxUzBckCoY
Tesla is way behind the curve on two of the biggest emerging tech trends in cars:
— E.W. Niedermeyer (@Tweetermeyer) February 22, 2023
1) LFP battery chemistry for safer and more affordable EVs, where BYD has built up an undeniable moat with its "Blade" packs.
2) Lidar for driving automation, where it is AWOL because FSD fraud. https://t.co/RlzANdOyqA
Or when he regurgitated a classic russian line, "Khrushchev's mistake".
— Walter Report πΊπ¦ (@walter_report) February 25, 2023
Don't even get us started on his peace deal nonsense. pic.twitter.com/qiXMWvsklm
Remember that this freak is one of Musks top interlocutors on the platform https://t.co/FeuIUeNGNV
— Josh Marshall (@joshtpm) February 25, 2023
For those keeping track. Jones switched from Trump to DeSantis because Trump was pro-vaccine.
Alex Jones is off Team Desantis. He is pulling his support for Desantis because he won’t come out strongly against aid for Ukraine. pic.twitter.com/7QYK6GPQfH
— Ron Filipkowski πΊπ¦ (@RonFilipkowski) February 23, 2023
While self-described "anti-imperialists" in the West are always prepared to sympathise with Putin, his own mouthpieces on state TV like Olga Skabeyeva openly say things like this
— Francis Scarr (@francis_scarr) February 22, 2023
"Biden accused Putin of striving to restore an empire - as if there’s something bad about that" pic.twitter.com/jpmzd9yufP
That didn’t take long. pic.twitter.com/FougYneddC
— Ron Filipkowski πΊπ¦ (@RonFilipkowski) February 25, 2023
Hawley’s anti-Ukraine tweet this morning won him a segment on Tucker tonight: “I would just say to Republicans, they can either be the party of Ukraine and the globalists or you can be the party of E. Palestine and the working people of this country.” pic.twitter.com/7TDih29ti1
— Ron Filipkowski πΊπ¦ (@RonFilipkowski) February 25, 2023
Marjorie Taylor Greene on Tucker Carlson's show characterizes Putin's war as "this war against Russia in Ukraine" pic.twitter.com/Nnm7laDZ4X
— Aaron Rupar (@atrupar) February 24, 2023
Right Twitter is now filled with guys like this who've apparently spent the last year cocooned with alt-right influencer coverage and apparently aren't aware of the flood of war reporting of all kinds which likely make this the most covered and recorded war in human history. https://t.co/aJrKtvmiRH
— Josh Marshall (@joshtpm) February 25, 2023
Realism really could do with a new spokesman https://t.co/QLewV2CuSg
— Josh Marshall (@joshtpm) February 25, 2023
Michael Flynn is now a Ukraine War Truther in the sense that he’s not even sure there is a war going on. pic.twitter.com/uIEJxEOL02
— Poker and Politics (@PokerPolitics) February 24, 2023
And if you're tired of Republicans spreading Russian propaganda...
"As a general matter I don't take Beijing's propaganda at face value" -- Absolutely amazing: Matt Gaetz tried to use literal Chinese propaganda during a congressional hearing, and got called on it by a witness pic.twitter.com/2OS9Q9z9Ad
— Aaron Rupar (@atrupar) February 28, 2023
In other political news...
These people see or say this, those people see or say that. Such are the means by which @nytpolitics plans to navigate the coming battle for American democracy. Meanwhile, Mr. Weisman has done it. He can fairly be called the greatest 'both sides' journalist of his generation. https://t.co/fmgYryfp8S
— Jay Rosen (@jayrosen_nyu) February 24, 2023
overturning a half-century old constitutional right isn't cheap https://t.co/Yyf9W5lU6I
— John Harwood (@JohnJHarwood) March 1, 2023
to be fair, they're not in the news business https://t.co/XNVdDdZj7m
— John Harwood (@JohnJHarwood) March 1, 2023
Yet another anti-library bill, in North Dakota. Imagine the imagination of the creepy legislators mapping the bits of bodies that can’t even be mentioned. Or maybe they didn’t imagine; I could believe these shmucks had some intern stand on display as they wrote the law. pic.twitter.com/6LRaO9qSyj
— Jeff Sharlet (@JeffSharlet) February 24, 2023
This video compilation is devastating for Republicans. pic.twitter.com/RviKJHpS0M
— No Lie with Brian Tyler Cohen (@NoLieWithBTC) February 22, 2023
The more it unfolds the more DeSantis campaign seems like "Jeb! (But more fascist)"
— Josh Marshall (@joshtpm) February 28, 2023
Update. Security guard at Desantis book signing trying to remove Trump supporters tells them that he is also a Trump supporter, but they are acting like the far Left by harassing him. pic.twitter.com/mks4uPzoMD
— Ron Filipkowski πΊπ¦ (@RonFilipkowski) February 28, 2023
Chait is one of the few journalists who has come to terms with what DeSantis really is.
DeSantis's authoritarian threat to exert control over Disney's ideological content has received shockingly little attention https://t.co/S52rhcnwXx
— Jonathan Chait (@jonathanchait) February 28, 2023
As alluded to earlier, anti-vaxx is the one issue where DeSantis has successfully flanked Trump to the right.
Awful news in Florida from @bruce_y_lee @Forbes: Lee County FL GOP Passes Resolution To Ban Covid-19 Vaccines.
— Prof Peter Hotez MD PhD (@PeterHotez) February 24, 2023
The title of my forthcoming book with @JHUPress is “The Deadly Rise of Anti-Science: a Scientist’s Warning” https://t.co/5mhJs1z4ve
We may get Joseph to weigh in on this one.
The underpowered studies often have extremely low compliance. You might say, "Ah, doesn't this mean masks don't work in practice because no one complies?" No, because sometimes there is high compliance -- but it's not achieved through the methods in the underpowered RCTs!
— Jason Abaluck (@Jabaluck) February 13, 2023
7/n And one thing I find really interesting is that if you aggregate together the primary outcomes from the three mask studies conducted during COVID-19, what you see is reasonable evidence for a modest effect pic.twitter.com/IOEdLE8QTa
— Health Nerd (@GidMK) February 10, 2023
And in tech news...
— Terminal Value (@valueterminal) February 26, 2023
ππππππππππ pic.twitter.com/AWSVNuX7AQ
— π·CONCERNED_CITIZENS_OF_NAVARRO_COUNTYπ (@CCofNavarro) February 25, 2023
They're called digital assets because they go from 1 to 0
— Matthew C. Klein (@M_C_Klein) November 8, 2022
Wednesday, March 1, 2023
It always feels reassuring when Josh Marshall agrees with you
Kilmeade desperately trying to find someone in a FL diner who wants Desantis for president. It doesn’t go well. pic.twitter.com/IxJPYa9lVF
— Ron Filipkowski πΊπ¦ (@RonFilipkowski) February 28, 2023
From Talking Points Memo:
Ignore the Noise. It’s Still Trump’s Nomination to Lose
Every day we see more evidence that Donald Trump has jumped the shark — poor fundraising, deteriorating elite GOP support, mounting criminal legal peril and more. Meanwhile, Ron DeSantis, coming off a resounding reelection win, has all the malevolence and lib-owning of Trump and none of the baggage. The only remaining bright spot for Trump are the polls which continue to show him … well, to be the leader of the GOP and the odds-on favorite to be the 2024 GOP nominee. Yes, that’s what I’m saying. Don’t believe the hype: Trump is still the guy. And if you look at recent polls he seems to be becoming more the guy rather than less as we get further from the November election.
Back in August, when the mainstream press had almost convinced itself that DeSantis was all but assured to replace Trump as the party's leader, we ran this post questioning the analysis behind the then standard narrative.
_________________________________________________
Wednesday, August 24, 2022
I shouldn't have to say this but a 49-25 poll is not good news for the 25 (and it gets worse)
First off, the decision of the New York Times to even conduct a presidential poll more than two years before the election is irresponsible and bad for for Democracy. It distracts from important conversations and, since the data are largely worthless, its main function is to introduce noise into the conventional wisdom.
But while the data are not worth wasting any time analyzing, the analysis in the NYT piece
by Michael C. Bender is worth talking about, and I don't mean that in a
good way. This represents a disturbing throwback to the wishful
analytics of the second half of 2015, showing that many data journalists
and the publications that employ them have learned nothing in the past
seven years.
Back in the early (and not so early) days of the
last Republican primary, 538, the Upshot, and pretty much everyone else
in the business were competing to see who could come up with the best
argument for why being consistently ahead in the polls was actually bad
news for Trump. These arguments, as we pointed out at the time, were laughably bad.
Just as being ahead in the polls was not bad for Trump in 2015, the results of this poll (to the extent that they have any meaning) are not bad for Trump in 2022. When elections approach, parties tend to converge on whoever has the clear plurality, and 49% is a big plurality, particularly when a large part of it consists of people who are personally loyal to Trump rather than to the GOP. On top of that, 53% of self-identified Republicans had a "very favorable" opinion of the former president and 27% were "somewhat favorable."
80% favorable is a good number.
Politically,
this is a time of tumult, and all predictions at this point are little
more than educated guesses, but given the losses and scandals Trump had
seen by the time this poll was taken, his support was remarkably solid,
which is the opposite of how Bender spun it.
And it gets worse
Here's the headline and the beginning of Bender's piece. [emphasis added.]
Half of G.O.P. Voters Ready to Leave Trump Behind, Poll Finds
Far from consolidating his support, the former president appears weakened in his party, especially with younger and college-educated Republicans. Gov. Ron DeSantis of Florida is the most popular alternative.
By focusing on political payback inside his party instead of tending to wounds opened by his alarming attempts to cling to power after his 2020 defeat, Mr. Trump appears to have only deepened fault lines among Republicans during his yearlong revenge tour. A clear majority of primary voters under 35 years old, 64 percent, as well as 65 percent of those with at least a college degree — a leading indicator of political preferences inside the donor class — told pollsters they would vote against Mr. Trump in a presidential primary.
Notice the phrase "GOP voters." That 49% refers to the respondents who said they thought they would vote in the Republican primary. Among that group, those who identified as Republicans went for Trump over DeSantis 56% to 21%.
If we're talking about who is likely to be nominated (which is, as mentioned before, an incredibly stupid and irresponsible question to be asking more than a year before the election), people who say they are going to vote in the primary are a reasonable group to focus on, but they cannot be used interchangeably with Republicans, which is exactly what Bender does.
While we're on the subject, this was a survey of 849 registered voters,
so when we limit ourselves to those who said they were going to vote in
the Republican primary then start slicing and dicing that, we are
building big conclusions on a foundation of very small numbers.
And it gets worse. [Emphasis added]
While about one-fourth of Republicans said they didn’t know enough to have an opinion about Mr. DeSantis, he was well-liked by those who did. Among those who voted for Mr. Trump in 2020, 44 percent said they had a very favorable opinion of Mr. DeSantis — similar to the 46 percent who said the same about Mr. Trump.
Should Mr. DeSantis and Mr. Trump face off in a primary, the poll suggested that support from Fox News could prove crucial: Mr. Trump held a 62 percent to 26 percent advantage over Mr. DeSantis among Fox News viewers, while the gap between the two Floridians was 16 points closer among Republicans who mainly receive their news from another source.
Here's a fun bit of context. Fox has been maxing out its support of DeSantis for years now.
Steve Contorno writing for the Tampa Bay Times
(from August of 2021):
The details of this staged news event were captured in four months of emails between Fox and DeSantis’ office, obtained by the Tampa Bay Times through a records request. The correspondences, which totaled 1,250 pages, lay bare how DeSantis has wielded the country’s largest conservative megaphone and show a striking effort by Fox to inflate the Republican’s profile.
From the week of the 2020 election through February [2021], the network asked DeSantis to appear on its airwaves 113 times, or nearly once a day. Sometimes, the requests came in bunches — four, five, even six emails in a matter of hours from producers who punctuated their overtures with flattery. (“The governor spoke wonderfully at CPAC,” one producer wrote in March.)
There are few surprises when DeSantis goes live with Fox. “Exclusive” events like Jan. 22 are carefully crafted with guidance from DeSantis’ team. Topics, talking points and even graphics are shared in advance.
Once, a Fox producer offered to let DeSantis pick the subject matter if he agreed to come on.
If
I were DeSantis's campaign manager, this poll would scare the shit out
of me. Fox has pushed him to a degree unprecedented for a politician at
that stage of his career. He has also gotten tremendous (and appallingly
credulous) coverage from the mainstream press, but he just doesn't
register. I know political scientists and data journalists don't like to
talk about things like personality, let alone charisma, but for
whatever reason, DeSantis has not made much of an impression.
It's
possible cataclysmic events (of which we're seeing a definite uptick)
will hand the Florida governor the nomination or maybe even the
presidency, but if this poll had any meaning, it would be bad new for
him and good news for Trump.
And it gets worse.
This wasn't just an article based on worthless data sliced ridiculously thin wishfully analyzed to get conclusions completely at odds with the actual numbers; this was an influential and widely cited article based on worthless data sliced ridiculously thin wishfully analyzed to get conclusions completely at odds with the actual numbers. It instantly became a fan favorite among political journalists.
The article was published on July 12th and immediately became part of the conventional wisdom. A little less than a month later, the FBI raided Mar-a-Lago, and the "Republicans are moving on from Trump" voices suddenly grew quieter, as even the highest ranking party members responded with unhinged accusations and threats of retribution. Though the pundits desperately wanted to believe otherwise, they had to acknowledge that the GOP still belongs to Donald Trump.Tuesday, February 28, 2023
From the large language model joke book
Smith College economist James Miller has a great example of a ChatGPT answer that looks pretty good until you drill down.
Monday, February 27, 2023
A modest defense of YIMBY
So the province is falling completely short of the goal, that is also completely inadequate to make up for the bad policy of the past. At a time when the population is rapidly increasing (e.g., see the student visa situation).
The fight is over 23 stories or the 18 which is currently zoned. The comments are mad -- questions of whether the housing is affordable. Remember, the province needs to double the current record of housing (in the 1970's) just to stay standing still. What is the letter writer concerned about?
Regarding the highrise at the Wellington lot. Nothing being built should be more than five storeys tall.Creating wind tunnels and blocking out the sun and sky is a Toronto answer to keep developers happy.Low rise is the best answer going forward. Community is important.Tornadoes and power outages are more of a problem when the buildings are too high. Think, what then.
Ted Donaldson, a nearby resident and opponent of the townhome plan, said planning staff in the report appeared “hellbent on shoehorning” the project in against the wishes of 71 neighbours.“Infill is essential. Nobody here sees another single family home being built on this lot,” Donaldson told the committee. “Infill must complement what is already there. It’s like a sculptor adding finishing touches to an already great neighbourhood. Infill is not a sledgehammer.”Critics of the project expressed concerns about damage to trees, potential drainage issues on the lot, limited parking and garbage collection at the site.
What are they hoping for?
“Five of these units, set back from the road, I could definitely support,” she said, adding she can’t vote against the proposal at the committee because she is not a member.
Now, it is true that this particular project is not going to materially effect the housing crisis, should it end up reduced to 5 units instead of ten. But the real goal is at the end:
Opponents of the project say they are not opposed to development on the property, but believe a 10-unit townhouse cluster is out-of-synch with the character of the neighbourhood.
Critics also see the potential rezoning as a warning to other London homeowners, who could see similar high-density infill projects crop up in subdivisions filled with single detached homes.
Basically, there is no way to grow the population of the province and not change the character of the cities. between 2011 and 2021, Ontario grew from 12.8M to 14.2M, which is 1.4M new citizens in 10 years. If this high rate of growth continues, which is the federal policy, then the idea that density can be opposed will require entirely new cities to be created.
The other nasty secret, is that single family detached housing adds value to a neighborhood. It is a popular type of housing, Those neighborhoods that resist density reap a significant financial benefit and if every small project needs to go through a political fight then we'll never manage to end the housing crisis except in an explosion. It is true that not every new house can help with affordability, but a dramatic shortfall, in the face of an accelerated population boom, is sure not going to result in affordable housing, either. At some point, massively restricted supply has to have a market effect.
Friday, February 24, 2023
When watching YouTube can make smarter
Here are a few to start your weekend.
Common Sense Skeptic -- CSS is best known for their take-downs of Elon Musk's more outrageous claims (colonizing Mars, solving the labor crisis with humanoid robots. etc.), but they also make make time to debunk a wide range of scams by actually running the numbers and citing mountains of relevant research,
LegalEagle -- Devin James Stone was a lawyer before he was a YouTuber and he is one of the best at making legal issues understandable without oversimplifying them. He also knows when to ask for help, often brings in guest lawyers who specialize in that day's topic.
Brick Experiment Channel -- I love real engineering and this is one of my favorite channels in the field.
David Mitchell's Soapbox -- Funny and thoughtful essays about everyday subjects like social conventions, language, and, in this case, advertising.
Thursday, February 23, 2023
Senator Rick Scott and Simple Solutions
All federal legislation sunsets in 5 years. If a law is worth keeping, Congress can pass it again. [Bold added by me]
It has been replaced by:
All federal legislation sunsets in 5 years, with specific exceptions of Social Security, Medicare, national security, veterans benefits, and other essential services. If a law is worth keeping, Congress can pass it again. Note to President Biden, Sen. Schumer, and Sen. McConnell — As you know, this was never intended to apply to Social Security, Medicare, or the US Navy [Bold in original]
I think this change illustrates two things.
One, upon close inspection all sorts of bad examples appear that look alarming. The example of the Navy jumps out immediately, but the US Navy is a construct of legislation and the idea that it would sunset every 5 years seems bleak. All you get is a ton of work constantly renewing legislation. including this one (unless it becomes constitutional). Other fun questions arise about all sorts of foundational laws. For example, the supreme court is mentioned in the constitution but all of the rests of the courts are established by legislation.
Article III of the Constitution, which establishes the Judicial Branch, leaves Congress significant discretion to determine the shape and structure of the federal judiciary. Even the number of Supreme Court Justices is left to Congress — at times there have been as few as six, while the current number (nine, with one Chief Justice and eight Associate Justices) has only been in place since 1869. The Constitution also grants Congress the power to establish courts inferior to the Supreme Court, and to that end Congress has established the United States district courts, which try most federal cases, and 13 United States courts of appeals, which review appealed district court cases.
For example, the size of the supreme court comes from the Judiciary act of 1869, which I do not see in the intended list of essential services. Reading the constitution, I see very few details and no support for the lower courts independent of legislation. So could the federal court system simply vanish because congress got distracted or gridlocked on another matter? One presumes that serious answers to these questions need to be thought about in advance.
One also wonders about the 1790 residence act. Or the 1952 Immigration and Nationality Act. Or the 1878 Posse Comitatus act. This is really shooting fish in a barrel. There are hugely important laws that form the basis of civil society, which is why I bolded legislation in the first quote above.
Finally, this is no longer simple. Now, every law has to be categorized as "sunset" or "doesn't sunset", a herculean task which could be equally accomplished by just having a plan to sunset unnecessary rules. No congress can bind a predecessor. But these sort of mass sunset plans tend to go poorly even when the laws in question are a small portion of the total. Because current laws may have replaced other important laws and there are some quite unexpected interactions that occur.
Now, old laws get struck down all of the time, although maybe this wasn't the example that Senator Scott was aiming for. But I think the real answer is that this document was rhetorical in nature, and not intended as a serious proposal. But I do think it illustrates the problems of "one simple solution" and the benefits of a careful engagement with the underlying issues.
That said, I got this far without mentioning social security, so my editor will be annoyed. So let me say that I agree with Josh Marshall that the goal is to cut social security. I think that the coming demographic shift is unpleasant to deal with -- there is no way to keep benefits at current levels indefinitely and not raise additional revenue. I do think that the sums involved are a lot more modest than the doomsayers say, but that they are enough to cause some pain. This is a hard problem, which is why it has not been simply solved already. But fixing it requires a real discussion about trade-offs and not a simple idea.
Wednesday, February 22, 2023
More SoCal Weather
We're having quite a year.
Blizzard warning issued for SoCal mountains, with snow also expected at unusually low elevations
LOS ANGELES (KABC) -- A storm expected to be the coldest of the season is blowing into Southern California, bringing chilly rain and snow at low elevations.
The snow is expected to fall as low as 1,000 to 1,500 feet, meaning areas like Santa Clarita and lower-lying areas of the Inland Empire will see a rare coat of powder.
And at higher elevations, the National Weather Service has issued a blizzard warning starting Friday morning for the mountains of Ventura and Los Angeles counties. The service predicts from 2 to 5 feet of snow could accumulate in the mountains above 4,000 feet, falling even as heavy winds gust up to 75 mph.
Below that, at elevations of 2,000 to 4,000 feet, about 6-12 inches of snow are expected.
Visibility at that time is expected to be very low and travel is not advised through those areas. The blizzard warning is in effect from 4 a.m. Friday to 4 p.m. Saturday.
Passes like the Grapevine [I-5 from LA to the Central Valley and the Bay Area. -- MP] and the Cajon Pass are likely to also see dangerous driving conditions. Drivers are advised to bring chains and a full tank of gas and be prepared for difficult weather and road closures.
"They're expecting snow to drop as low as 1,000 feet," said Mark Bishoff with Caltrans. "The top of the Grapevine is a little over 4,000 feet, so they're expecting it to be impacted by snow."
Just for a bit of context, the highest point in the city limits of LA is slightly over 5,000 feet. In the county, it's slightly over 10,000 feet.
Tuesday, February 21, 2023
Tuesday Tweets -- Hype and Glory
We start with a reminder that much of the world's trouble is caused by profoundly damaged people who desperately want attention.
Laura Jedeed has the disturbing details.I sure am going to miss the Project Veritas Dance productions. https://t.co/oVf2XXZUfx
— Ron Filipkowski πΊπ¦ (@RonFilipkowski) February 21, 2023
Project Veritas’ 2020 voter-fraud allegations are the organization’s bread and butter: likely the biggest reason for its $22 million haul that year. Yet O’Keefe uses the allegations solely to lead into his blood feud with The New York Times. His voiceover provides intricate legal arguments for the defamation lawsuit recently filed against the Times while O’Keefe himself — the real one, not the actor — dances onstage. The dancers in haute-couture newsprint dresses contort themselves as Lady Gaga replaces Jamiroquai and here we are, back where we began.
“You and me are like a bad romance,” Gaga sings, and I have to say, she’s not wrong. As the song reaches its crescendo, O’Keefe’s voiceover describes a 2021 encounter with the executive editor of The New York Times, who refused to acknowledge O’Keefe’s existence, which the real O’Keefe acts out onstage.
“In that moment, the muckraker had to come to grips with the fact that this supposed paragon of investigative journalism would never give him the time of day, and would never acknowledge his very humanity,” the voiceover says, referring to himself, as he does throughout his latest book, in the third person. The New York Times dancers claw at the real O’Keefe as he staggers to the front of the stage, heartbroken. “That small part of him that still hungered for recognition and acceptance from the ‘legitimate press’ — he once read The New York Times every morning — would never be satisfied.”
Segue to politics...
Trump mocks Desantis for his paltry turnout in NY today. pic.twitter.com/m3bSXfXkOd
— Ron Filipkowski πΊπ¦ (@RonFilipkowski) February 21, 2023
Worth noting that Trump is now going after DeSantis for his stand on Social Security and Medicare (a position shared by most of the governor's fellow Republican politicians but by few of their constituents).
Fox News is down in ratings? Not compared to the rest of cable news pic.twitter.com/P2NcvPZSmK
— Aaron Rupar (@atrupar) February 19, 2023
All of this may be having an effect.
Orlando CNN — Walking out to a slick hype video and tossing hats into a raucous crowd as he approached the microphone, Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis on Thursday demonstrated for the Conservative Political Action Conference the bravado and fighting attitude that has made him the most popular elected Republican in the country among conservatives.
2023
He’s afraid of Trump and Trump supporters now. https://t.co/M2446y0ruO
— Ron Filipkowski πΊπ¦ (@RonFilipkowski) February 20, 2023
"Dems in disarray"
Lindell say he’s going after RINOs at the state level to purge them from leadership: “This is a warning to all you Republicans..when we come to your state, you better get out of the way if you’re not gonna be on board. You better hunker down if you don’t want to join us.” pic.twitter.com/CBXbrK9Gjn
— Ron Filipkowski πΊπ¦ (@RonFilipkowski) February 18, 2023
In order to be allowed to participate in primary debates, you would have to pledge to support the eventual nominee, whoever that might be. The division and strife in the GOP is turning it into a politburo where you have to threaten and cajole people to get their support. pic.twitter.com/7mwKBozVCY
— Ron Filipkowski πΊπ¦ (@RonFilipkowski) February 18, 2023
Just a reminder, the only clear policy difference between the two leading GOP candidates is that Trump has not gone anti-vax.This Duval County teacher who went viral for exposing empty book shelves due to DeSantis' book banning has been fired. This is not what freedom looks like. https://t.co/qpE0FZh6nx
— Thomas Kennedy (@tomaskenn) February 16, 2023
Welp.
— Charles Gaba (@charles_gaba) February 19, 2023
Idaho bill to criminalize providers of COVID vaccines introduced https://t.co/DDY0tIuR9D
Putin and MAGA
Congressman Paul Gosar, (R: Moscow), tweets his support for Vladimir Putin: pic.twitter.com/d3aZTw3MaE
— Roshan Rinaldi (@Roshan_Rinaldi) February 20, 2023
Long thread.
Remember when I predicted that the MAGA talking point today was going to be that Biden should’ve went to OH instead of Ukraine? That was before any of these. pic.twitter.com/YQaM2qY2IY
— Ron Filipkowski πΊπ¦ (@RonFilipkowski) February 20, 2023
I'll have a write-up soon of the "Rage Against the War Machine" rally, which claimed to be an anti-war protest but was really just a pro-Russia rally attended by (literal) neo-nazis, fascists, & an array of Kremlin apologists who think peace means appeasing a violent dictator. pic.twitter.com/Vc3YIDEIhb
— Caroline Orr Bueno, Ph.D (@RVAwonk) February 19, 2023
And another.
1/PART 1, THE EVENT: I’ve been working on an investigation for @WashSpec that reaches to the very top of the Kremlin. It’s a few weeks from completion, but we decided to share this work in progress early because failing to do so may place people in significant danger. pic.twitter.com/bKfchA2fOw
— Dave Troy (@davetroy) August 29, 2022
Marshall reads the NYT for us.
Karl Bode also reads the NYT for us.folks, something is wrong with the Times pic.twitter.com/iTMHaIhVVy
— Josh Marshall (@joshtpm) February 19, 2023
we can't fund journalism or education but we can throw untold billions upon billions of dollars at techno bullshit artists whose entire fortunes are built on elaborate, speculative gibberish propped up by a gullible press pic.twitter.com/sYlX9j40bs
— Karl Bode (@KarlBode) February 20, 2023
This "crypto land" was truly the stupidest grift; I can't believe people are gullible enough to fall for it. Mindlessly chanting "early internet" over and over does not make something intrinsically worthless have value.https://t.co/H8avChW04Z
— Stephen Diehl (@smdiehl) February 19, 2023
OpenAI may be the most overhyped company in living memory.
Natural language is a terrible way to specify the form and function of a software-intensive system, unless that system is in a narrowly defined domain that already has well-understood patterns. https://t.co/BA9F1G1llZ
— Grady Booch (@Grady_Booch) February 21, 2023
Most anyone would score that high if it was an open book exercise. https://t.co/leyLqEsnoQ
— Grady Booch (@Grady_Booch) February 20, 2023
A) not really
— Grady Booch (@Grady_Booch) February 17, 2023
B) this tells us more about the inadequacy of our measurements than it does the efficacy of ChatGPT https://t.co/36dgoTnOEy
One more from Grady.
Most software is just like that. https://t.co/MvX5hJ5VjP
— Grady Booch (@Grady_Booch) February 20, 2023
I saw replies suggesting there might be a 'nicer' arrangement. While it's true that there isn't yet a proof of optimality for 17 squares, there are packing problems with similarly awkward solutions which are proven optimal. For instance 10 circles in a square (look lower right): pic.twitter.com/KE6XGU7WKC
— Daniel Piker (@KangarooPhysics) February 14, 2023
And taking us full circle to the first sentence of the post...
NEW: Elon Musk directed Twitter engineers to design a secret system to boost his tweets over everyone else's after his post about the Super Bowl did poorly compared to President Biden's: https://t.co/HsJ0BZOSCI
— ZoΓ« Schiffer (@ZoeSchiffer) February 15, 2023
This is possibly the most pathetic sentence I’ve ever read, and that includes anything about Trump. pic.twitter.com/AZuwmwQvXb
— Charles Gaba (@charles_gaba) February 15, 2023
Monday, February 20, 2023
Small update on Sinema
Ruben Gallego is leading all his potential competitors (a good sign for Gallego) but in no matchup does he exceed the 50% mark (a good sign for the GOP and Kyrsten Sinema).
Ruben Gallego being the front runner for the Democratic nomination, should the Democrats decide to run a candidate. This under 50% is a true statement but the question here is whether it makes sense for Sinema to run.
Looking below at favorability, Gallego is +6 with independents and +56 with democrats. Sinema is -6 with independents and -19 with democrats (only -4 with republicans, her strongest group). But the three possible replication candidates range from +21 to +30 with republicans, so it isn't like that is a natural base for her to poach important levels of support. She does beat all three possible republicans with independents, but Gallego does even better without losing support from his own party. (Doug Ducey is in the polls but not the favorability ratings).
But these are completely intuitive results. The worst case for Gallego is running against a moderate republican (it is a purple state) and not having Sinema in the race. That said, most of the time she hurts the republican more. Look at Doug Ducey, who looks like Gallego's toughest fight at this stage.
With Sinema: D 32, I 17, R 27, Undecided: 23
Without Sinema: D 38 (+6), R 34 (+7), Undecided 28 (+5)
There is a general pattern of Sinema possibly hurting the Republican candidate, stealing more support from them, more than the Democratic candidate. Now undecideds could break heavily R and create a path to victory for Doug Ducey or Blake Masters (even the weakest R candidate is currently outpolling Sinema). But what is the advantage to either side in not running a candidate?
Sinema votes for D priorities the majority of the time, including judges. Why would Rs not run a candidate with that pattern of favorability (Karrin Taylor-Robson is more popular with Ds than Krysten Sinema, an impressive feat). But the argument against Ruben Gallego running crucially depends on Sinema winning -- if the Rs could field a candidate that could pull in the D base (and, obviously the R base) then what is the benefit of losing while doing well with independents? Keep in the mind, many of the normal mechanisms that would bolster support for the Democratic candidate like "they won the primary" and "our candidate, right or wrong" are not going to work with an independent who specifically avoided obtaining this support. That the Republican candidate might poach support from the Democratic base against the independent candidate is a clear sign of how extraordinary this situation might be.
Finally, the threat of going negative has to considered in context of whether you want this to become a common tactic to remove the D senate candidate. Consider:
Sinema’s allies say that Gallego will get tarred as too left wing and also hint darkly that they’ve got a load of oppo to use against what Palmeri oddly terms the “twice-married Gallego.” Either might be true. I have no idea. But neither makes Sinema more viable.
But any race could have an independent appear and start smearing a candidate. If you give into these threats then you'll be constantly abandoning races. The key is that Sinema has a -19 favorability among her own party in her own state. That is a basic political skill.
To make the independent trick work, I suspect that you need to personally be very popular (so that stepping aside is a pretty clear win) as well as being a pretty reliable ally. Angus King is a sitting independent senator and is 62-28 (+34) in his state of Maine. Bernie Sanders has a favorability rating of 64 in his state of Vermont in 2020, down from an epic 80-17 (+63) in 2016. Sinema is 37-47 (-10) in her state of Arizona. Neither Sanders or King gets national headlines attacking D priorities like the minimum wage from the right.
All of this to say that the polls just don't support this maneuver and her conduct as a senator is probably why they don't. It doesn't help matters that Mark Kelly has won as a D twice since Krysten Sinema's historic win, making Arizona a state with two D senators, at least until Krysten Sinema went independent. But that leaves open the question of why not try to have two again?
So, I agree with Josh Marshall. The path to victory here for an independent with these favorability ratings is very narrow indeed.
Friday, February 17, 2023
One more rant on the libertarian idea of children
Thursday, February 16, 2023
If a TV show runs in the city and nobody sees it...
Since leaving New York, Beth has found herself in tears at least once a week. She makes $300,000 a year — more than she’s ever earned in her life — but she’s running out of minutes in the day to squeeze out more dollars. “How do I make the $700,000 that I’m going to need to send her to private school or do the renovation in the attic so I can turn it into the master suite so I can have a tub and so I can have one thing I enjoy in my life?” she says. Her takeaway from the show: “Both avenues are shit. You can stay in New York and climb, climb, climb and never get where you need to go and give yourself a nervous breakdown, or you can move to the suburbs and be like, Who the fuck are these pod people? Neither seems great. Is the secret to it all that we have to just choose a lane and embrace it?”
The national press, particularly publications with "New York" somewhere in their name), never tire of telling us about the financial and emotional hardships faced by the bottom half of the top one percent. By the standards of the genre, the NYM piece lacks the hilarious budgeting assumptions explaining how a middle class couple can find it hard to scrape by on $300,000 or the stunning cluelessness of a Bret Stephens who thinks a couple in SF making $400,000 are lucky to manage a Camry, still it's hard to beat lines like "so I can have one thing I enjoy in my life."
But as I started to read up on Fleishman, I started thinking this story might fit better with another long running thread.
The series has gotten a ton of coverage...
... which means (and I apologize for disillusioning some of our less worldly readers) Disney is spending a ton on PR. The streaming industry runs on hype and easy to promote awards bait play a big role.
Opinion | Establishment media’s elitism is driving middle America away. Here’s why my next two columns will focus on a Hulu show about a rich couple living in Brooklyn.
— New York Times Pitchbot (@DougJBalloon) February 10, 2023
Whenever you're reading about these shows, the first question you should ask is "how many people are actually watching. (The second question is "who owns the IP?"). It's often difficult to find out -- streaming services are secretive about these numbers -- but FlixPatrol is probably as good as we'll get. Here's their list of Hulu shows ranked by viewership for 2022.
For a sense of what is popular, here are the top 20. (check out number 5)
2. P-Valley
3. The Kardashians
4. Power Book IV: Force
5. General Hospital
6. Law & Order: Special Victims Unit
7. Bob's Burgers
8. Power Book III: Raising Kanan
9. House of the Dragon
10. The Chi
11. Euphoria
12. Power Book II: Ghost
13. 9-1-1
14. Love Island
15. Only Murders in the Building
16. Grey's Anatomy
17. Abbott Elementary
18. The Patient
19. The Good Doctor
20. This Is Us
If you go down the list (or use control-F), you find FIiT at 97 out of 119.
Though we can't say exactly how many viewers it takes to get to position 97, we can be pretty sure it's a very small number by TV standards. You almost have to wonder... If you took all the people who wrote articles about Fleishman Is in Trouble, and all the people quoted in those pieces, is it possible you'd have a majority of people who actually watched the show?
Wednesday, February 15, 2023
Whatever happened to the Washington Post's "The Truthteller"? -- repost
It debuted ten years ago to a great deal of hype (much of which has a definite 2023 feel), then, as far as I can tell, faded quietly away. Now that automating journalism is back in the news, it might be interesting to revisit what happened to the last next big thing in the field.
Monday, February 18, 2013
Yeah, I'm getting tired of these too
Late last month, The Washington Post debuted "The Truthteller," an application that it hopes will soon be able to fact-check politicians' speeches in real time using speech-to-text technology and a vast database of facts. Brooke talks to Cory Haik, The Washington Post's executive producer for digital news, about the app.Of course, the speech-to-text and database problems are trivial next to the issues with processing natural language. To work at anywhere near the level discussed by Haik, the system would have to be considerably more advanced than IBM's Watson. Watson was designed to address short, free-standing questions following similar linguistic conventions and having clear, unambiguous answers.
This isn't meant to denigrate the team that developed Watson. Just the opposite. Interpreting natural language is extraordinarily difficult and solving even highly constrained problems is an impressive and important accomplishment. IBM has a lot to brag about.
The Washington Post currently has a beta up that apparently can sometimes spot strings that look like simple factual statements that lend themselves to automated comparison to a database. There's no reason to believe the app will ever move much beyond that, but the interviewer did believe...
without sign of suspicion...
immediately after a segment boasting about how carefully On the Media checks its facts.
To quote Snoopy, "the mind reels with sarcastic replies."
Tuesday, February 14, 2023
Supplemental material for Prof. Narita's class
In case you aren't familiar with the professor's research (from NYT via Gelman):
A Yale Professor Suggested Mass Suicide for Old People in Japan. What Did He Mean?
In interviews and public appearances, Yusuke Narita, an assistant professor of economics at Yale, has taken on the question of how to deal with the burdens of Japan’s rapidly aging society.
“I feel like the only solution is pretty clear,” he said during one online news program in late 2021. “In the end, isn’t it mass suicide and mass ‘seppuku’ of the elderly?” Seppuku is an act of ritual disembowelment that was a code among dishonored samurai in the 19th century....
Some surveys in Japan have indicated that a majority of the public supports legalizing voluntary euthanasia. But Mr. Narita’s reference to a mandatory practice spooks ethicists.
Viewing of supplemental materials is, of course, required.
Monday, February 13, 2023
Dems in Disarray
Remember all of the "Trump is fading away" articles a while back? These think pieces combined wishful analytics with a curious belief that Trump would peacefully go along with being pushed aside (even though the nomination would at least partially avert or at least delay indictments).
I'm still not seeing it.
Trump on Desantis: “Ron would’ve not been governor if it wasn’t for me. Number 1, he wouldn’t have gotten the nomination, and number 2 - he wouldn’t have beaten his Democrat opponent. So then when I hear he might run, I consider that very disloyal.” pic.twitter.com/11r2k3b6z0
— Ron Filipkowski πΊπ¦ (@RonFilipkowski) January 29, 2023
Far Right Burns Sarah Sanders Over Response Speech That 'Insulted Trump' - National Memo https://t.co/FyCaCxx3c5
— Caroline Ramsey-Hamilton (@RiskAlert) February 9, 2023
Lou Dobbs tells Bannon that Sarah Huckabee Sanders speech tried to undermine Trump in favor of Desantis: “I think that was a great insult to Trump - not mentioning his name. To not mention his name, to talk about ‘new leadership’ .. it was a shame.” pic.twitter.com/Qekoo1LWmB
— Ron Filipkowski πΊπ¦ (@RonFilipkowski) February 8, 2023
Not only is Disloyal DeSantis an ingrate, but he’s a copy cat who desperately wishes he was Trump. He never had these mannerisms before becoming Gov. He tried to create himself in the image of Trump,but he’s the dollar store made in China version.That’s why I call him #RipOffRon. pic.twitter.com/lxTbOrVdwE
— Laura Loomer (@LauraLoomer) January 31, 2023
Can’t really find anything to argue with here. pic.twitter.com/fcXjiHZsyJ
— Ron Filipkowski πΊπ¦ (@RonFilipkowski) February 9, 2023
This is a good point. A year before his re-election, Desantis had raised more than he could ever spend on that race. He continued to raise gobs of $ knowing that he was going to use that money to run against Trump. Did Trump supporters know their $ would be used against Trump? pic.twitter.com/NvUHtkgRhS
— Ron Filipkowski πΊπ¦ (@RonFilipkowski) February 11, 2023
And it gets better.
From Alex Henderson:
Right-wingers ranging from the Daily Wire’s Ben Shapiro to Fox News’ Rupert Murdoch to firebrand author Ann Coulter are very bullish on Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis as an alternative to Donald Trump for the 2024 GOP presidential primary. But The Lincoln Project’s Rick Wilson, a Never Trump conservative and former Republican strategist, has a very different viewpoint. Wilson has predicted that ultimately, the GOP will "bend the knee" and give Trump the 2024 nomination after his attacks on the Florida governor grow increasingly vicious.Although DeSantis has yet to officially declare a presential run, Trump’s attacks on him are — just as Wilson predicted — becoming nastier and more mean-spirited. In a Truth Social post, Trump accused DeSantis of "grooming high school girls with alcohol as a teacher." DeSantis’ supporters were quick to call Trump out, but in a column published by The Bulwark on February 9, Never Trump conservative Tim Miller (a former GOP strategist) accuses them of being "hypocrites" who can dish it out but can’t take it.
"For some MAGA observers," Miller observes, "there is one thing startlingly new-ish about the former president’s latest broadside. It’s his target: Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis, the prized stalking horse of the conservative infotainment industrial complex…. If you missed it, Trump’s latest attack featured a picture in which DeSantis is shown drinking with women who appear younger than him and are allegedly his students. One included the caption 'Here is Ron DeSanctimonious grooming high school girls with alcohol as a teacher.'"
Absolutely perfect @Timodc on the hypocrisy-fest that ensues when one sexual McCarthyite attacks another https://t.co/DOpGgzwDkM
— Jonathan Chait (@jonathanchait) February 9, 2023
Desantis fans now responding to Trump’s Groomer Desantis posts today. pic.twitter.com/l6SL2Jgfm5
— Ron Filipkowski πΊπ¦ (@RonFilipkowski) February 7, 2023
In case you've forgotten.
The real victim here is Elon. Cheong and Catturd are two of his new besties. Now they're fighting and he's caught in the middle.