Another new year topic seems to be that of self driving cars. This is a nice piece on the subject, with a smart take on the problems of having a human driver ready to take over:
First, as one might infer, the human who is suddenly asked to intervene is going to have to quickly asses the situation. The handoff delay means a slower response than if a human had been driving the entire time. Second, and even worse, the human suddenly asked to take control might not even see what the emergency need is. Third, the car itself might not recognize that it is about to get into trouble. Recall that Uber tried to blame a car accident when its self driving car was making a left turn on the oncoming driver, when if you parsed the story carefully, it was the Uber car that was in the wrong.This is exactly correct. Problems that can be foreseen well in advance really don't typically need a human driver. It is the moment that things go wrong that you need a sense of judgment. And I can't think of a more boring thing to be doing than constantly watching the car drive. I would much rather either check out and do something else (e.g. read) or be accumulating information on issues like road surface slipperiness.
Remotely located drivers are even worse (imagine a bad cellular connection during the driving emergency).
If we have a way to make a self-driving vehicle work than I am an enthusiast, but I want to make sure that the new option is better than the current technology. We might get there, but it is during an emergency that I want the enhanced reflexes of a computer the most.
No comments:
Post a Comment