If we had found better ways to unlock the vast stores of energy that we know are lurking inside the nuclei of atoms, we'd have those flying cars and Mars colonies and everything people thought we'd have back in the 50s (OK, the Economist doesn't say that, but it's true).When did we lose this ambition and can we get it back?
Comments, observations and thoughts from two bloggers on applied statistics, higher education and epidemiology. Joseph is an associate professor. Mark is a professional statistician and former math teacher.
Thursday, March 15, 2012
Something that Mark and I have been talking about is how much less audacious we have been (as a country) since the 1950's. Back then there was a real sense of inevitable progress and an idea that there were great accomplishments lurking around the corner. Noah Smith weighs in with an example of this:
Labels: Mark, Noah Smith, technology
Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)
I think there are still amazing technological innovations happening - one only needs to look at what's going happening with the internet. However, I think the 1950's/60's were characterised by physical engineering achievements whereas nowaday they are more software engineering achievements.ReplyDelete
But maybe that's because we just don't see the physical engineering achievements where they are happening. The technology of war has improved amazingly.
It is true, we could be missing a lot of ambitious things in the military arena. I am mostly disappointed by how Paris seems to be able to build light rail faster than Seattle can.ReplyDelete