In medical research, data privacy is paramount. So it is unlikely that we'll be taking advantage of things like cloud computing anytime soon.
However, even if I could, I doubt that I would in the absence of brutally complete back-ups (which would rather eliminate any space savings). Because the world is broken up into two groups of people: those who have lost data due to crashes and those who are yet to do so. When you are in the former group, it seems the height of insanity not to be as a careful as possible about keeping data safe.
Heck, I dislike how the SAS program editor does not have an autosave feature. I've lost code because I walked away from the computer for a meeting and windows decided that was an ideal time for an auto-update. In that sense, the static environment of using the computer as a tool is at war with the dynamic vision of computer developers.
I wonder if, at some point, we'll branch off into two streams? Computers are cheap enough that you no longer need one platform for everything and I mostly use the internet at work for downloading articles (a function that slowly updated libraries could pretty much handle).
It is an interesting thought.
One of the few parts of my life where I'm openly OCD and proud of it: Hitting save in SAS.ReplyDelete
While I agree (completely) with the need to be OCD about hitting save in SAS, is it too much to ask for an auto-save feature?ReplyDelete
When I was younger I used to consider it impolite to carefully save work in all my open windows before responding to an office visitor. I fear enough bad outcomes have made me less polite . . .
At the risk of dead-horse-beating, SAS, for all its strengths is simply not responsive to its users.ReplyDelete
Let's keep in perspective, though, that for all that I am a huge fan, R is actually less user friendly. It was a major accomplishment but they really put the effort into get that bottom slot.ReplyDelete
The user friendly statistics package is clearly STATA. It's a pity UF isn't supporting it right now.