Today the patriotic brand of anti-militarism, the brand that sees skepticism about the military and the promotion of peace and commerce as specifically American, is largely forgotten.In the comments, people seem to focus on the question of just how historical is this viewpoint, anyway. There are some obvious historical advocates (President Eisenhower, for example) but it may or may not have been widespread and people's views may have evolved.
However, I think this falls into the "is/ought" fallacy, in the sense that (even if it was not especially widespread as a view) there is no reason that this could not be a valid expression of patriotism. The question of why a country with a history of isolationism, small standing armies, and a tradition of innovation/commerce could not focus on the economic parts of being American is unclear.
It's an idea that should get more attention.
Post a Comment