Showing posts with label Greg Mankiw. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Greg Mankiw. Show all posts
Saturday, May 28, 2011

Consistency

›
I was looking at Andrew Gelman's blog and saw his discussion of Ray Fisman's piece on compensation . I was especially struck by th...
Friday, May 20, 2011

Tax Policy

›
Mark has been discussing the concerns about the hardship that tax increases would inflict on those with an income exceeding $250,000 per yea...
Thursday, January 27, 2011

One more exchange on Mankiw's assumptions

›
More from the ongoing debate . Here's David (pulled from a longer comment): I think where we disagree (assuming that we do disagree) is...
1 comment:
Friday, January 21, 2011

Hoisted from comments -- still more on Mankiw's assumptions

›
Following this and this , here's the latest in my ongoing debate with David over Mankiw's use of assumptions. Drawn from a longer c...
1 comment:
Wednesday, January 12, 2011

Hoisted from comments -- more on Mankiw's assumptions

›
David had this to say about my post critiquing the way Greg Mankiw and many other economist who defend the magic of the market don't s...
2 comments:
Monday, January 10, 2011

'Standard' does not mean 'sound'

›
Eric Schoenberg is raising some important points : [Greg] Mankiw concisely summarizes the theory underlying the ethical argument for market ...
2 comments:
Thursday, October 21, 2010

Tax increases as landscape perturbation?

›
Over at Felix Salmon's site , Justin Fox presents an interesting counter-argument to Greg Mankiw: [T]here’s a really fascinating tale i...
Tuesday, October 12, 2010

Greg Mankiw's reply -- dishonesty or just bad prose?

›
From Mankiw's follow-up to his NYT editorial : Aren't you motivated by more than money? Of course. I have never suggested that mo...
1 comment:
Monday, October 11, 2010

The indispensable Professor Thoma

›
Having spent a lot of time recently on the issue of compensation, this post by Mark Thoma caught my eye: Greg Mankiw complains that if taxe...
4 comments: