Many years ago, on Monday, Democrats were gripped with panic about how the NYT/Siena showed they could never win again.
— Dave Weigel (@daveweigel) November 6, 2019
Some experts attribute the slowdown in VC investment in the early ‘20s to a number of entrepreneurs accidentally exploding themselves inside self-made Batsuits https://t.co/HpwBOc8xti
— dylan matthews (@dylanmatt) November 10, 2019
So much to argue with here, but let's start by what it says about a business to claim that it can only be viable if it's a monopoly.
Uber needs to buy Lyft to survive, and finally make profits https://t.co/yj3C0tB1oT
— Mark Palko (@MarkPalko1) November 11, 2019
"It amounts to what we might call Schrodinger's Bus, a situation in which a foundational instability is created by people simultaneously being on the team and under the bus depending on the context and which side of Pennsylvania Avenue you're looking from."
— Josh Marshall (@joshtpm) November 10, 2019
We've been arguing for a while that LGBT attitudes in red states are more complex and are evolving more rapidly than outsiders realize. As a gay man originally from Kentucky, I never thought I'd see the day a candidate who supports marriage equality would be elected KY-GOV. I rallied in 2004 against the state's proposed ban on marriage equality, which was approved by voters that year to my horror.
— Joshua Crawford (@JoshCrawfordNE) November 6, 2019
"Decades of research have shown that engaged parents and a stable family are far more important than schools and teachers to a child’s academic achievement..." https://t.co/ogcFiBJ6v6
— Barry Ritholtz (@ritholtz) November 10, 2019
Keep in mind that for years the NYT's leading science writer was the climate change skeptic, John Tierney.— Mark Palko (@MarkPalko1) November 10, 2019
So much to argue with here, but let's start by what it says about a business to claim that it can only be viable if it's a monopoly.
Uber needs to buy Lyft to survive, and finally make profits https://t.co/yj3C0tB1oT
— Mark Palko (@MarkPalko1) November 11, 2019
It's interesting that this method allows us to define multiplication without using any numbers! π¨✖️π₯ https://t.co/4f4KGOykOL
— Luis Batalha π΅πΉπΊπΈ (@luismbat) November 11, 2019
No comments:
Post a Comment