I was having a long distance conversation with a friend from
Atlanta recently. Like me, he spins way too much time watching
television and following politics (making for, as you would imagine,
some deeply nerdy conversations). When the subject turned to the
presidential campaign, he made a couple of observations
First,
there had been a dramatic change in the lawn sign distribution of
various neighborhoods. My friend has lived in Atlanta for well over 20
years now so he knows the red spots and the blue spots. Driving through
neighborhoods that in the past couple of elections would have had a
Trump sign in nearly every yard, he noticed only a handful. There were
even a few "Republicans for Biden/Harris" signs around. By comparison,
the spots where one expected to see Democratic signs had as many as
normal if not a few more.
This
isn't particularly surprising. Biden has field offices up and running in most if not all competitive states.
At last report, Trump had none. We've known this for a while, but it's interesting to
see how this translates to the ground level.
Just as
striking was the disparity in television spots. He has seen well over a dozen ads for Biden / Harris and exactly zero
for Trump.
This too is not surprising. The
Democrats are having a very good year for fundraising. The Republicans
are not. Furthermore, a substantial amount of the money they are raising
has been earmarked for Trump's legal costs.
I
don't care much for the phrase "must win state." Barring cases like
California and New York for the Democrats or Texas and possibly Florida
for the Republicans, it is possible to come up with not too outlandish
paths to victory excluding any one of the swing states. That said,
Georgia has got to be one of the top priorities for the Trump campaign,
and if they don't have a presence there, you have to wonder what they're
doing.
No comments:
Post a Comment