tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6976144462093297473.post3807628399678868872..comments2024-03-26T19:10:00.791-04:00Comments on West Coast Stat Views (on Observational Epidemiology and more): Tech companies may lie to you but we never do Josephhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10760453165301871031noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6976144462093297473.post-35058083516784588022013-08-09T17:03:27.449-04:002013-08-09T17:03:27.449-04:00As for UHF, I believe pretty much all antennas bui...As for UHF, I believe pretty much all antennas built since 1965 when the All-Channel Receiver Act went into effect have been VHF/UHF, which is why the writer was basically accurate when he/she wrote "any TV antenna you've ever used."<br /><br />No question that the amplified antennas can be valuable (I switched to one myself when I moved to the north side of LA). My concern is that most of the journalists covering the story (and, as far as I can tell, all of those at the NYT) continue to get basic details of this story wrong even though it would take all of thirty minute of online research to get it right.Markhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14705408455380402571noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6976144462093297473.post-18696585180191018102013-08-09T12:20:47.196-04:002013-08-09T12:20:47.196-04:00Key point: any UHF antenna. And yes, they are much...Key point: any UHF antenna. And yes, they are much smaller than VHF yagi's because UHF wavelengths are an order of magnitude shorter. There is however, some value in powered antennas, especially in densely packed urban environments where multipath signals can overwhelm the receiver; say if you are on the East River on Manhattan, where barges and large ships create water induced attenuation of the signals.bobahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02176542687278791678noreply@blogger.com